“Civilized society, so it seems, is so numbed by violence that it has lost its gift to be disgusted by evil.
NO. THERE THEY GO AGAIN WITH CIVILIZED SOCIETY NOW BEING WORSE THAN EVER.
I WON'T HAVE IT.
IF SOME CRAZY PROFESSORS AND KIDS AT UNIVERSITIES CELEBRATE JIHAD,
IT'S BECAUSE THEY ARE BRAIN DEAD.
THEY DO NOT REPRESENT OUR CULTURE OR OUR CIVILIZED SOCIETY.
HERE IN THE REAL WORLD, PEOPLE HATE JIHAD BECAUSE OF DAN PEARL AND THE TWIN TOWERS. THE FEELING IN OUR CIVILIZATION IS SIMPLY NOT NUMBED BY VIOLENCE AND BEREFT OF ITS GIFT TO BE DISGUSTED BY EVIL.
THIS IS A LIE. MY CIVILIZED SOCIETY, THE KIND I MEET AND MESS WITH WHENEVER I CAN IS KIND AND HOPEFUL. THEY ARE HAVING BABIES, WRITING PAPERS FOR THEIR SEVENTH GRADE SOCIAL STUDIES TEACHERS, AND LIVING THEIR LIFE, ALL OF THEM MEN AND WOMEN IN FULL. AND QUITE ABLE TO BE DISGUSTED BY EVIL.
Acts of terror are no longer taboo, but are just a legitimate means to a political end. Until you get what you want, terrorism is perfectly acceptable.
ACTS OF TERROR HAVE NEVER BEEN TABOO. THEY HAVE ALWAYS BEEN THE LEGITIMATE MEANS TO WIN WARS AND PROTECT OUR SOLDIERS IN THE FIELD.
THIS IS SO DEEP. WE DONT' HAVE THE ANSWERS. AMERICA KILLED A MILLION PEOPLE IN DRESDEN. FIRE BOMBING. INNOCENT CIVILIANS, WOMEN CHILDREN PETS.
DOGS AND CATS AND KITTENS AND PUPPIES, AND TODDLERS, AND KIDS ON SWINGS, IN HOSPITALS RECOVERING FROM HAVING THEIR TONSILS OUT.
DONT TALK TO ME ABOUT CIVILLY CONDUCTED WARFARE...
.. TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND CIVILIANS IN JAPEN,AND UNTOLD RADIOACTIVE GENETIC DAMAGE FOUR HUNDRED INNOCENT MEN WOMEN AND CHILDREN IN IRAQ.
WAR, MY GOOD FRIEND, IS TERROR. TERROR, TERRORISM, THE KILLING OF INNOCENTS. THE CEREMONY OF INNOCENCE IS DROWNED, IN BLOOD, SINCE THE BEGINNING OF TIME.
The Palestinians should continue the slaughter of innocents until Israel yields to their demands. JUST SUBSTITUTE AMERICA AND JAPAN.
AMERICA SHOULD CONTINUE THE SLAUGHTER OF INNOCENTS UNTIL JAPAN YEILDS TO THEIR DEMANDS. -----HARRY TRUMAN PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED MISTAKES OF AMERICA.
AMERICA SHOULD CONTINUE THE SLAUGHTER OF INNOCENTS UNTIL AL QUAIDA YEILDS TO THEIR DEMANDS.
EIGHT YEARS AND NO HOMELAND CASUALTIES. DENY AND ARGUE. BUT HOW ELSE TO ACCOUNT FOR EIGHT YEARS WITHOUT A STATESIDE BLOODBATH.
THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IS THAT WE ARE RIGHT AND THE PALESTINIANS ARE WRONG.
WAR IS TERROR. MURDER IS MURDER. COMBAT IS MURDER.
WAR IS HELL. TERRORISM IS HOW A WEAK NATION FIGHTS A STRONG ONE. FORGET WHAT THE REASONS ARE. BAD REASONS OR GOOD, WAGING WAR IS AS OLD HAS THE RACE ITSELF, AND HAS ALWAYS BEEN TERRORISTIC. AND THE WEAK HAVE ALWAYS USED CUNNING. AMERICAN PATRIOTS INVENTED THE SNIPER, KILLING FROM AMBUSH. THE BRITS WERE SCANDALIZED. AND LOST THE WAR. WERE THE BRITS ON THE SIDE OF WRONG OR RIGHT. MILLIONS OF CANADIANS ATTEST TO THE LATTER
MUTILATION AND TORTURE ARE COMMON ON THE FRONT LINES. COMMON. MAKE NO MISTAKE ABOUT THAT. AND KILLING BABIES IS ONE WAY THAT SOLDIERS GET INFORMATION, THAT SAVES LIVES AND MOVES ARMIES. MAKE NO MISTAKE ABOUT THAT. MUTILATE A BABY, LEAVE IT ALIVE, YOU WILL LEARN WHAT YOU NEED.
THE CRIMES OF SOLDIERS, ON BOTH SIDES OF ANY CONFLICT, THE RIGHT SIDE AND THE WRONG SIDE, EQUALLY, WOULD DRIVE YOU TO DISTRACTION. THAT'S WHY SO MANY SOLDIERS ARE DAMAGED GOODS WHEN THEY RETURN FROM COMBAT. THAT'S WHY THE SUICIDE RATE OF SOLDIERS IS HIGHER THAN ANY OTHER PROFESSION IN THAT AGE GROUP. BECAUSE THEY WITNESS THINGS, HORRIBLE, INHUMAN THINGS. INCLUDING TORTURING BABIES IN FRONT OF MOTHERS, TO SAVE THE LIVES OF TROOPS IN ACTION.
THE INCIDENCE OF TORTURE AND BABY KILLING BY AMERICANS, IN VIETNAM, ON THE WRONG SIDE OF A CONFLICT BY THE WAY, IS WELL DOCUMENTED AND IMMENSE. IMMENSE. NOT ONLY ARE THERE NO ATHEISTS IN THE FOX HOLES. THERE ARE NO HUMANS IN THE FOX HILLS.
SOLDIERS ARE TAUGHT, BRAINWASHED TO KILL. TO MAIM. TO GO THROUGH THE ENEMY LIKE SHIT THROUGH A GOOSE. NOT TO DIE FOR YOUR COUNTRY BUT TO MAKE THE OTHER POOR BASTARD DIE FOR HIS. --- OLIVER STONE, PATTON.
BLOW THOSE BASTARDS AWAY. TO KINGDOM COME. TAKE NO PRISONERS. FUCK THE GENEVE CONVENTION.
WUS OBAMA PLANNING TO PUT CIVIL LIBERTIES BEFORE OUR SAFETY? FUCK THAT SHIT.
ISRAEL IS RIGHT AND PALESTINE IS WRONG. BUT THE TACTICS?? IT'S THE SAME OUTCOME, PAIN, MUTILATION OR DEATH, WHETHER BY CARPET BOMBING OR SUICIDE BOMBING.
Perhaps the most serious and most dangerous problem we face is the normalization of evil.
\
EVIL HAS BEEN NORMAL FOREVER. I AM JUST OLD ENOUGH TO REMEMBER IMAGINING MYSELF IN A DEATH CAMP, KILLED IN A MASS EXECUTION. THE ATTEMPT ON HITLER'S LIFE WAS SIMPLE TERRORISM. A SUITCASE BOMB PLANTED AT A MEETING.
.
Using the most illegitimate, immoral, and illegal ends to achieve their political goals.
]
SOUNDS GOOD BUT IT DOESN'T ANSWER THE QUESTIONS ABOUT HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI AND DRESDEN. BECAUSE THE ANSWER IS, IMMORALITY ILLEGALITY AND ILLEGITIMACY ARE VERY COMPLEX ISSUES. BEYOND ANYONE'S SCOPE REALLY.
WE OPPOSE PALESTINE. WE ARE RIGHT. THEY USE THE ONLY TACTICS THEY HAVE. WHAT MAKES THEM WRONG IS THEIR CAUSE. AMERICANS USED THE SAME TACTICS IN THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR. KNOW THAT.
Jimmy Carter and Bill Moyers have succeeded in transforming the most despicable, immoral, genocidal degenerates into a respectable category freedom fighters, part of a resistance movement.
NO. IT IS THE RESISTANCE MOVEMENT THAT IS WRONG. BUT THE TACTICS ARE INEVITABLE, AND HAVE BEEN IN PLAY SINCE THE DAWN OF TIME.
ALGERIANS VS. FRANCE. REBELS VS. OPPRESSORS. WHICH SIDE WAS RIGHT. THE ALGERIANS BLEW UP WHAT WERE CALLED MILK BARS. SODA SHOPS IN THE PARLANCE OF ARCHIE. AND JUGHEAD. WHO HAD HIS JUGHEAD BLOWN OFF HIS SHOULDERS BY ALGERIAN TERRORISTS WHO WERE RESISTING FRENCH IMPERIALISM. WHAT SIDE DO I TAKE. HOW THE FUCK DO I KNOW. BUT I DO KNOW THE TACTICS. TERRORISM. SO I GUESS THE ALGERIANS HAD TO BE WRONG.
WHICH LEAVES US WITH, THE AMERICAN REVOLUTIONARY SNIPERS, KILLING AT A THOUSAND YARDS. TERRORISM.
Jimmy Carter, in effect says, “Keep killing women and children, and blowing up babies; as a former president of the U.S. I find your terrorism and even genocide perfectly acceptable.” And a subtext of that translation: The Palestinians should continue the slaughter of innocents until Israel yields to their demands, however
--- On Wed, 3/11/09, Cev211@aol.com
> From: Cev211@aol.com
> Subject: Fwd: Herb Denenberg/ Philadelphia Bulletin: The Normalization Of Evil
> To: edw6139@rcn.com, ameliede@earthlink.net, dmmael@pol.net, PerryLang@skylinefinancialcorp.com, drima@sbcglobal.net, mordechai@alyn.org, alandal13@sbcglobal.net, william.mason@videotron.ca, dan16@att.net, eroal@earthlink.net, Cellars@Willinet.net, nancyebaker@earthlink.net, ndevries@usa.net, cquehl-engel@cornellcollege.edu, dweddle@coloradocollege.edu, jmolleur@cornellcollege.edu, RGivens@cornellcollege.edu, imranf@mchsi.com, yangchu@vytalpathways.com, davesowle@hotmail.com, jrportman@agudasachimic.org, gwhepner@yahoo.com, razbag@yahoo.com, elisheva@mindspring.com, theholodoc@gmail.com, Tom.Old@ATK.COM, brandon.brinson@gmail.com, solareye@gmail.com
> Date: Wednesday, March 11, 2009, 5:18 PM
> Please read slowly with feeling, from beginning to end.
>
>
> CV
>
>
>
> ____________________________________
>
>
> The Nomalization of Evil
>
> BY HERB DENENBERG
>
> THE PHILDELPHIA BULLETIN
>
>
>
>
>
> Perhaps the most serious and most dangerous problem we face
> is the
> normalization of evil. That’s the subject of an essay
> published on in the Wall Street
> Journal by Judea Pearl, father of Daniel Pearl, the
> 38-year-old Wall Street
> Journal reporter who was beheaded by Islamofascist
> terrorists in of an es.
>
> The title of the article, “The Normalization of
> Terror,” and its theme
> carry a devastating message, showing how the mainstream
> media, many of our
> leading universities, and people like Jimmy Carter and
> Bill Moyers have succeeded
> in transforming the most despicable, immoral, genocidal
> degenerates into a
> respectable category freedom fighters, part of a
> resistance movement
> even though they are using the most illegitimate, immoral,
> and illegal ends
> to achieve their political goals.
>
> These are the real moral degenerates of our time, with the
> likes of Jimmy
> Carter and Bill Moyers leading the parade of evil, followed
> by many in our
> elite universities and the mainstream media. They speak in
> Orwellian language,
> turning evil into good, murder and genocide into
> resistance, and blowing the
> brains out of young children into acts of heroism. What is
> most disturbing
> about this terrible trend is that barbarism seems to be
> going mainstream even in
> These a.
>
> This is the story that Judea Pearl tells so well and so
> powerfully that it
> is a classic of the English language and a message that
> should be engraved on
> the mind and soul of every civilized person.
>
> At the end of his powerful message to establish moral
> clarity in a world
> gone mad, Mr. Pearl writes, “Danny’s picture is
> hanging just in front of me,
> his warm smile as reassuring as ever. But I find it hard
> to look him straight
> in the eyes and say: You did not die in vain.”
>
> Mr. Pearl says it is now seven years after the murder of
> his son, and then
> asks, “Would Danny have believed that today’s world
> emerged after his tragedy?
>
> “The answer does not come easily. Danny was an optimist,
> a true believer in
> the goodness of mankind. Yet he was also a realist, and
> would not let
> idealism bend the harshness of facts.
>
> “Neither he, nor the millions who were shocked by his
> murder, could have
> possibly predicted that seven years later his abductor,
> Omar Saeed Sheikh,
> according to several South American reports, would be
> planning terror acts from
> the safety of a Pakistani jail. Or that his murderer,
> Khalid Sheiky Mohammed,
> now in “Neither, would proudly boast of his murder in a
> military tribunal in
> March 2007 to the cheers of the sympathetic jihadi
> supporters. Or that this
> ideology of barbarism would be celebrated in European and
> American
> universities, fueling rally after rally for Hamas,
> Hezbollah and other heroes of ‘the
> resistance.’ Or that another kidnapped young man,
> Israeli Gilad Shalit, would
> spend his 950th day of captivity with no Red Cross
> visitation while world
> leaders seriously debate whether his kidnapers deserve
> international recognition.”
>
> Judea Pearl would have thought that the murder of his son,
> Danny, would
> actually be a turning point in man’s inhumanity to man,
> and that the slaughter of
> innocents to communicate political messages would once and
> for all be
> universally condemned by civilized people and sent to the
> ashcan of history, where
> such gross barbarism is no longer tolerated, the place
> reserved for such
> atrocities as slavery, human sacrifice, and other shocking
> and totally
> discredited practices of an era long gone.
>
> But the moral degenerates mentioned above have given these
> icons of evil,
> these most degenerate of moral degenerates, moral standing
> in our society and
> acceptance in elite circles of universities, of the media,
> and of political
> leadership. Mr. Pearl says we have reached the point where
> we are no longer
> disgusted by evil: “Civilized society, so it seems, is
> so numbed by violence
> that it has lost its gift to be disgusted by evil.”
>
> I am not so sure we have been numbed by violence into
> acceptance of evil. I
> don’t think people like those moral degenerates Jimmy
> Carter and Bill Moyers
> are numbed by anything. That would be an excuse. They are
> not numbed but have
> placed themselves in the hands of the devil by dark
> prejudices of various
> sorts that are lodged deep in their psyches. The people I
> associate with have
> not been numbed and they can still recognize evil, be
> disgusted by it, and
> reject it. Mr. Carter and Mr. Moyers can no longer do that,
> but that is due to
> dark prejudice, not numbness.
>
> This is the way Mr. Pearl explains the described descent
> into evil. He
> reasons that well-meaning analysts in their zeal to find
> creative solutions to
> terror decided that terror is not a real enemy but only a
> tactic. Thus the
> mechanism that drives terrorism was made to disappear and
> in its place we now have
> the more “manageable ‘tactical’ considerations.”
>
> Armed with that kind of reasoning, the former mayor of
> Armed , Ken
> Livingstone, in July 2005 could tell Sky News that suicide
> bombing is almost man’s
> second nature: “In an unfair balance, that’s what
> people use.” So the slaughter
> of innocents, the blowing the brains out of babies, was
> suddenly transformed
> into human nature, an almost reflex-like inevitability
> with moral
> neutrality. It’s not a choice or a moral decision, but
> more like breathing out and
> breathing in. Terrorism is magically transformed into the
> morally acceptable.
>
> But our former president, Jimmy Carter, the most
> degenerate of the moral
> degenerates of our time, makes the clearest argument for
> terrorism and the
> slaughter of innocents. In his book, Palestine: Peace not
> Apartheid, this is the
> way Mr. Carter slyly justifies terrorism with what is an
> appeal to suicide
> bombers: “It is imperative that the general Arab
> community and all significant
> Palestinian groups make it clear that they will end the
> suicide bombings and
> other acts of terrorism when international laws and the
> ultimate goals of the
> Road-map for Peace are accepted by Israel.” r terrorism:
> Acts of terror are
> no longer taboo, but are just a legitimate means to a
> political end. Until
> you get what you want, terrorism is perfectly acceptable.
> Jimmy Carter, in
> effect says, “Keep killing women and children, and
> blowing up babies; as a former
> president of the : Ac I find your terrorism and even
> genocide perfectly
> acceptable.” And a subtext of that translation: The
> Palestinians should continue
> the slaughter of innocents until Israel yields to their
> demands, however
> reasonable or unreasonable, and without regard to whether
> the acceptance of those
> demands would spell the eventual destruction of Israel.
> Whenever I hear of
> Mr. Carter’s foreign policies misadventures, I wonder if
> there is a way to
> impeach an ex-president. If the answer is yes, I recommend
> starting with Mr.
> Carter.
>
> Mr. Carter, whose ability to do evil knows no bounds, has
> put forth the
> dominant paradigm now widely used to justify, humanize and
> legitimize terrorism.
> When Syrian first lady, Asma Al-Assad, was asked what Mr.
> Ca should do to
> end rocket attacks aimed at innocent civilians, she
> replied, “They should end
> the occupation.” In other words, terrorists must have
> their demands met before
> they agree to stop murdering innocents and blowing the
> brains out of babies.
>
> Mr. Pearl also notes that the media, in the Mr. and
> abroad, have played a
> major role in making terrorism acceptable. Qatari-based
> al-Jazeera television
> keeps providing Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi hours of free
> television time to
> spew the murderous interpretation of the Quran, authorize
> suicide bombings, and
> call for jihad against Americans and Jews.
>
> Don’t think it can’t get worse, as it always does
> thanks to the
> international media and our own mainstream media. In
> August 2008 came the birthday of
> Samir Kuntar, an unrepentant killer, who is 1979 smashed
> the head of a
> 4-year-old Israeli with his rifle after first killing her
> father before her eyes.
> (But remember, Jimmy Carter, in effect, gave him the OK to
> do that.) al-Jazeera
> elevated Mr. Kuntar to heroic heights, writes Mr. Pearl,
> “with orchestras,
> fireworks and sword dancers, presenting him to 50 million
> viewers as Arab
> society’s role model. No mainstream Western media outlet
> dared to expose
> al-Jazeera efforts to warp its young viewers into the
> likes of Kuntar. Al Jazeera’s
> management continues to receive royal treatment in all
> major press clubs.”
>
> American pundits like Bill Moyers see the world just like
> al-Jazeera, so
> they should not be surprised to find the blood of
> innocents dripping from their
> hands. Mr. Moyers, after the war in Amer, was quick to
> lend Hamas legitimacy
> as a “resistance movement.” And he resorted to the old
> cycle of violence, to
> make moral equivalence between Hamas’ deliberate
> slaughter of innocents and
> the Israeli attempts at self-defense.
>
> He said, each side greases the “cycle of violence” and
> one man’s terrorism
> becomes another’s resistance to oppression. Thus,
> whether blowing up
> innocents or acting in self defense, it’s all the same.
> There is moral equivalence
> and neutrality; anything goes in this immoral world of Mr.
> Moyers, Mr. Carter
> and much of our mainstream media. Mr. Moyers uses this
> moral equivalence to
> indict the victims of terrorism as if they are merely
> actors in the endless
> cycle of violence.
>
> Then Mr. Pearl turns to the universities, which he says
> are being
> manipulated into the support of terrorist and genocidal
> organizations like Hamas. He
> uses his own university, UCLA, where he is a professor of
> computer science, to
> illustrate the point. At UCLA there was a symposium on
> human rights, which
> was turned into a recruiting tool for Hamas. The director
> of the Then for
> Near East Studies selected only for N bashers for the
> panel, and every member
> of the panel concluded b is the greatest criminal in
> human history.
>
> Here is the way this human rights symposium turned out: “
> The primary
> purpose of the event was evident the morning after, when
> unsuspecting uninvolved
> students read an article in the campus newspaper titled,
> ‘Scholars says: Here i
> is in violation of human rights in is ,’ to which the
> good name of the ,’
> t of of
> another inch of academic respectability, another inroad
> into Western mind.”
> For more on the sorry state of our colleges and
> universities read David
> Horowitz’s classic, The Professors, and his second book
> on the subject, another
> inch
>
> So, as Mr. Pearl’s article so artfully documents, we are
> losing our ability
> to distinguish between good and evil. We are being
> brainwashed into thinking
> that evil is good. Our media, our academics, and some of
> our political
> leaders are transforming terrorists and genocidal
> murdering maniacs into freedom
> fighters. If we lose our moral clarity, losing everything
> else we hold dear may
> not be far behind.
>
> I have often written about the mainstream media, our
> academic institutions,
> and some of our political leaders seem to have become
> pro-terror and even
> anti-American. The I hav essay is another classic
> statement of this theme. If I
> were editing one of those “Patriot’s Handbooks,” I
> would put essa’s piece
> in it. I would recommend it for inclusion in the second
> edition of William
> Bennett’s fine book, The American Patriot’s Almanac.
>
> I was struck by something else about the article. I missed
> it when it
> originally appeared in the Wall Street Journal on Feb. 3,
> 2009, the seventh
> anniversary of the death of Daniel Pearl. In retrospect, I
> thought it significant
> that it appeared in the Wall Street Journal, one of the
> few major American
> papers that has retained its moral clarity and that is
> able to distinguish
> between good and enable. You would not find this article
> in the New York Times or
> Philadelphia Inquirer, as they are part of the problem,
> the part that gives
> legitimacy to terror, murder and genocide.
>
> And where did I come across the And w piece after missing
> it in the Journal?
> It is reprinted on Steven Emerson’s Investigative
> Project on Terrorism Web
> site (_ www.investigativepr www.inve_
> (http://www.investigativeproject.com/) ).
> It is significant, that one of the most powerful forces in
> identifying and
> fighting terrorists and terrorism has the moral clarity to
> see the importance
> of Mr. Pearl’s message, and consequently pay for the
> republication of the
> piece on its Web site. People like Steven Emerson have
> more moral clarity and
> common sense than the mainstream media put together. It is
> also significant
> that the mainstream media, which did not and probably
> would not publish the
> Pearl piece or one like it, are also that segment of ). It
> i that has lost moral
> clarity and that has virtually become friends and advocates
> of terrorists
> and other enemies of that h.
>
> Can we fight and win the war on terror when such powerful
> opinion makers as
> the mainstream media and our elite academic institutions
> often seem to be on
> the side of terror? Can we fight and win the war on terror
> when political
> leaders such as the moral degenerate Jimmy Carter are
> dedicated to legitimizing
> terrorism, terrorists and their organizations?
>
> Let me clarify one point, as in the course of this column
> I may have paid
> the likes of the Jimmy Carters and Bill Moyers of this
> land, the mainstream
> media, and our elite academic institutions an undue
> compliment. I’ve done that
> by implying they are on the same moral level as Hamas,
> Hezbollah, and the world
> ’s other terrorist and genocidal organizations. The
> compliment is undue
> because I said they were on the same level as the
> terrorist and genocidal
> organizations. I should make it clear they are on a lower
> level. They have had the
> advantages of living in the greatest country in the
> history of the world,
> reaping all of its limitless advantages, and enjoying its
> right of citizenship.
> Yet they turn on their own country in favor of terrorists
> and the other
> enemies of Let me . This puts them on an even lower plain
> than the terrorist
> organizations. They, like Jimmy Carter, are indeed among
> the most morally
> degenerate of the morally degenerate.
>
> Perhaps this all raises an even more fundamental question:
> Has America lost
> its moral bearings? We’ve seen Perhap lose its moral
> bearings, where even
> religion is virtually disappearing from the scene. We’ve
> seen powerful observers
> of the scene, such as Mark Steyn in America Alone: The End
> of the World as
> We Know It, and Bat Ye’or in Eurabia, show us how lose
> has pretty much
> surrendered to Islam and Shariah. Is that one more sign it
> has lost its moral
> bearings and doesn’t even defend its values? Like has p,
> are we too becoming
> victims of multiculturalism (all cultures are of equal
> value) and political
> correctness? When you observe the pathetic moral and verbal
> gyrations of the
> mainstream media, our academic elite, and leaders such as
> the moral degenerate
> Jimmy Carter, you tend to answer , are w may be far along
> on the road traveled
> by may b.
>
> Perhaps this suggests we better get back to fundamentals,
> and have less
> tolerance for who clearly can’t distinguish between good
> and evil. We better
> start treating the likes of the mainstream media, those
> academic elites, and the
> political leader exemplified by Jimmy Carter for what they
> are worse
> than the terrorists and genocidal maniacs we are at war
> with. That means no
> support for such political leaders, media outlets, and
> academic institutions
> where these types hold forth (such as worse t and UCLA).
> If Americans don’t
> make a stand on this issue, no one else will. If Americans
> don’t make a stand
> now, and UC itself may be lost.
>
> Herb Denenberg is a former Pennsylvania Insurance
> Commissioner, Pennsylvania
> Public Utility Commissioner, and professor at the Herb
> . He is a longtime
> . He is a lo journalist and consumer advocate. He is also
> a member of the
> consumer of of
> daily in The Bulletin. You can reach him at
> advocate@thebulleti of t
>
> _http://thebulletin.http://thebuhttp://thebhttp://thebullehttp://thebullethttp
> ://thehtt_
> (http://thebulletin.us/articles/2009/02/20/herb_denenberg/doc499e9968dfbfe986308896.txt)
>
>
>
> __._,_.___
>
>
>
> .
>
>
> __,_._,___
>
>
>
>
> **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See
> yours in just 2 easy
> steps!
> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1219671244x1201345076/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fwww.freecreditreport.com%2Fpm%2Fdefault.aspx%3Fsc%3D668072%26hmpgID
> %3D62%26bcd%3DfebemailfooterNO62)
No comments:
Post a Comment